Excerpts from new book: Exomologetarion: A Manual of Confession by Saint Nikodemos the Hagiorite

Excerpt #1:

CHAPTER 6
Concerning Thoughts

Just as so-called diagnostic physicians not only know how to treat external and visible wounds of the body, but also, by measuring the pulse, they learn the internal and invisible maladies of the heart, of the bowels, and the other unseen workings of the human body, and are therefore able to treat them.  Likewise, Spiritual Father, it is not enough for you only to know how to treat the external passions of the soul, those acts and deeds and effects of sin, but it is also necessary to know through the confession of the penitent the internal wounds of his soul, which are the hidden passions in his heart and the passionate and evil thoughts, and so treat them with great scrutiny and care.  For this reason we thought it good to inform you a little about some general and vital matters concerning thoughts.

How many types of thoughts there are

Know then, Spiritual Father, that in general, all thoughts are of three types: some thoughts are good, some thoughts are vain and idle, and some thoughts are bad.  Concerning good thoughts, it is not necessary to discuss here in detail how and from what aspects of the soul they arise, for we are satisfied that these are good and therefore beneficial and salvific to the soul.  We say this only, Spiritual Father, that if someone says to you during confession that he has good thoughts, you should counsel him to take care to be humble and to never trust in himself and become prideful: 1) because a person on his own is not able to do a good work or say a good word or even think a good thought without the power and help of God: “Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God” (2 Cor. 3:5); 2) because the devil is so cunning and evil, that many times he brings evil from good and through good thoughts throws those who are not careful into self-esteem, and conceit, and haughtiness, from which is caused the destruction and death of the soul.  So says Paul: “Sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good” (Rom. 7:13); 3) because man never remains in one state, but is so changing and so quickly alters that, with his thoughts, in one instant he is found in Paradise and in another instant he is in hell, as one Saint said.  And St. Isaac says: “By the mind we improve, and by the mind we become unprofitable,” hence the one who today has good thoughts may very well have evil ones tomorrow; and 4) tell him that the devil has greater envy and wages a fiercer battle against those who have good thoughts, so that he should have more fear and greater care over himself.

What vain thoughts are and how they are corrected

Those thoughts which are not profitable unto the purpose and aim of salvation, as much as to our own soul as to that of our neighbor, and do not look to the necessary requirements and constitution of our body, but to the superfluous and more-than-necessary things, even if they are good, I call vain and idle.  According to the Shorter Rules of Basil the Great, vain and idle thoughts arise from the idleness of the intellect that is neither engaged in necessary things, nor believes that God is present and searches our hearts and thoughts: “Mental aberration comes from idleness of a mind not occupied in necessary things.  For the mind is idle and careless from lack of belief in the presence of God Who tries the heart and reins… He who does this and what is like to it will never dare or have leisure to think of any of those things that do not conduce to the edification of faith, even if they seem to be good.” Concerning these vain and idle thoughts, I say, advise the penitent not to allow his intellect to meditate upon or ponder over them: 1) because just as we have to give an account for idle words on the day of judgment, as the Lord said: “But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment” (Mt. 12:36), so likewise we have to give an account on the day of judgment for idle and vain thoughts, and indeed, if we willfully left our intellect to go after them.  And it is thence apparent, because the Lord reproaches and condemns those servants who remain idle: “Why stand ye here all the day idle?” (Mt. 20:6); 2) because those vain thoughts deprive us from profitable and salvific thoughts, which we are able to have instead of them; and 3) because these idle thoughts are in themselves evil, as they are the cessation of good and become the beginning of evil, and as giving way and permission to the devil to sow in our idle intellect the tares of evil thoughts.  Thus does Gregory the Theologian confirm this: “May evil and its original cause, the devil, be destroyed.  For while we were idle, the evil one planted tares in us (cf. Mt. 13:25), in order that the neglect of good might become the beginning of evil, just as the beginning of darkness is the retreat of light.”

The causes of bad thoughts

Know that, in general, bad thoughts derive from two causes, one external and the other internal.  The external cause of bad thoughts is the sensible objects of the five senses, that is, those things seen, heard, smelled, tasted, and touched, like bad and indecent and theatrical sights, obscene words and lewd songs, scents and colognes and perfumes, luscious foods and pleasurable drinks, fine and soft clothes and comfortable mattresses.  All these things cause passionate and hedonistic thoughts in the soul, and then sinful and death-bearing thoughts.  Thus, the Prophet Jeremiah on one hand says: “Death has come up into our windows” (Jer. 21:9), the windows meaning the five senses.  On the other hand, Gregory the Theologian rather interpreted this saying in broader terms: “And it is kept until the fifth day (that is, the sacrificed Paschal Lamb), perhaps because the Victim, of Whom I am speaking, purifies the five senses, from which comes falling into sin, and around which the war rages, inasmuch as they are open to the incitements to sin.”

The internal causes of bad thoughts

The internal causes of bad thoughts are four:
1. The imagination, which is like a second sense and receives and records all of the images and perceptions which enter through the five senses, that is, of those things touched, tasted, smelled, and especially of those things heard and seen, is called an internal sense, because it portrays the things sensed so grossly and clearly, just as the external senses.  It is a common sense, according to Aristotle, because it receives commonly the experiences of all the senses; and this naturally, because just as lines are disconnected at the perimeter of a circle but converge at its center, so also the five senses, which are disconnected on the outside, converge in the imagination of the soul, but they converge without confusion.  So then, from the imagination are born bad thoughts in the soul, making it sense them as really present and to noetically conceptualize through memory those things that it should not have outwardly seen or heard or smelled or tasted or touched, even though it is sensibly far from these things and is settled peaceably in a deserted place.  For this reason, in his tetrastich Iambic Poetry, the Theologian said:

"A vision caught me, but was checked.
I set up no idol of sin.
Was an idol set up? The experience was avoided.
These are the degrees of deceit of the adversary.”

Do you hear?  He says an idol of sin was set up and was not recorded in the imagination.  The soul escaped the experience at once, that is, it escaped from consenting to the thoughts and from the committal of sin.

2. The passions are a cause of bad thoughts, which are generally two: love and hate, or pleasure and pain, for we are moved passionately either because we love something as pleasurable, or because we hate it as painful.  Specifically, the passions are divided into the three aspects of the soul: the intelligent, the appetitive, and the incensive.  The passions of the intelligent aspect, according to Gregory of Sinai, are unbelief, blasphemy, evilness, curiosity, double mindedness, gossip, love of applause, pretension, pride, and others.  The passions of the appetitive aspect are fornication, adultery, debauchery, greed, unchastity, incontinence, love of pleasure, self-love, and others.  The passions of the incensive aspect are anger, bitterness, shouting, audacity, revenge, and others.  From these passions of the soul, then, bad thoughts are generally and immediately born, these also being divided into three categories like the passions.  From the passions of the intelligent aspect of the soul come bad thoughts, which are generally given the name blasphemous thoughts.  From the passions of the appetitive aspect come the so-called obscene thoughts.  From the passions of the incensive aspect come the so-called evil thoughts.  For this reason the above-mentioned Gregory of Sinai said that: “The passions are the causes of thoughts,” and Abba Isaac also calls the passions assaults, because they attack within the soul and stir up passionate thoughts.

3. An internal and initial cause of bad thoughts is the demons, for those accursed ones, being light spirits and found superficially around the heart, speak there through internal suggestion and whisper softly from inside all the blasphemous thoughts, all the obscene thoughts, all the evil thoughts, and simply all the bad thoughts.  They train the imagination with obscene and impure idols from the senses, as much as when a person is sleeping as when awake.  From these the aforementioned passions in the three aspects of the soul are stirred up and make the wretched soul to be a cave of thieves and a slum of the passions.  For this reason the abovementioned Gregory of Sinai said: “Occasions give rise to thoughts, thoughts to imaginations, imaginations to the passions, and the passions give entry to the demons… but no one thing in the sequence is self-operative: each is prompted and activated by the demons.  The imagination is not wrought into an image, passion is not energized, without unperceived hidden demonic impulsion,” and in another place he says: “Thoughts are the promptings of the demons and precursors of the passions.” In agreement with this, St. Isaac says, “I hold as a truth, nevertheless, that our intellect, without the mediation of the holy angels, is able of itself to be moved toward the good uninstructed; however, our senses (the interior ones, that is) cannot come to know evil or be incited by it without the mediation of the demons.”

4. An internal cause of thoughts, however remote, is the passionate and corrupted condition of human nature which was brought about by the ancestral sin.  This condition remains in our nature also after baptism, not as ancestral sin as such (for this is removed through baptism, according to Canon 120 of Carthage), but as a consequence of the ancestral sin, for the exertion and test of our free will, and in exchange for greater crowns and rewards, according to the theologians.  For after the fall the intellect lost its innocent memory and thought which it had fixed formerly only on the good; but now when it wishes to remember and think upon the good, it is immediately dispersed and also thinks upon the bad.  For this reason the divine Gregory of Sinai said: “The source and ground of our thoughts is the fragmented state of our memory.  The memory was originally simple and one-pointed, but as a result of the fall its natural powers have been perverted: it has lost its recollectedness in God and has become compound instead of simple, diversified instead of one-pointed.”

Excerpt #2:

F.
Concerning Fasting on Wednesday and Friday

Canon 69 of the Holy Apostles designates that…

Ecumenism: Origins - Expectations - Disenchantment (Table of Contents)

Ecumenism in Practice
Metropolitan HIEROTHEOS of Nafpaktos and St. Blasios

The Church of Bulgaria vis-à-vis Ecumenism
Metropolitan NATHANAEL of Nevrokop, Bulgaria

The Church of Serbia vis-à-vis Ecumenism
Bishop ARTEMIOS of Raskas and Prizrin

Orthodox Mission in an Inter-religious and Inter-christian Milieu
Bishop PANTELEIMON of Ghana

From the Union Attempts after the 11th Century to the Contemporary Ecumenical Movement
Archimandrite Joseph, Abbot of the Holy Monastery of Xeropotamou, Mount Athos

Love and Truth in Ecumenical Dialogue
Geron Moses the Athonite

Mount Athos and Ecumenism
Geron Lukas Philotheitis

The Ecumenical Patriarchate and Ecumenism
Archpriest George Metallinos, Dean, School of Theology, Univ. of Athens

Is Orthodox Participation in the W.C.C. Justified?
Archpriest Theodore Zisis, Professor, School of Theology, A.U.Th.

The Patriarchate of Jerusalem and the Ecumenical Movement
Archimandrite Demetrios Vasiliadis, Secretary of the Holy Synod of the Patriarchate of the Jerusalem

The Liturgical Renewal Movement and Ecumenism
Archimandrite Nikodemos Barousis, Abbot of the Monastery of Panagia Chrysopodaritissa

Ecumenical Movement – Pastoral Consequences – Cypriot Actuality
Archimandrite Christophoros Tsiakkas, M.A. Theology, U.K., Sec. of the Snyodal Committee on Heresies of the Church of Cyprus

Contours of Conversion and the Ecumenical Movement
Hieromonk Alexy (Trader) of Karakallou

Romanian Ecumenism: A Challenge for the Orthodox Church of Romania
Hieromonk Vessarion, Holy Archangels Monastery, Neamts, Romania

The Church of Russia vis-à-vis Ecumenism
Archpriest Valentin Asmus, Professor, Theological School of Moscow

The Stance of the Church of Greece and Theology vis-à-vis Ecumenism
Archpriest John Fotopoulos, B.D., LL.B.

Joint Prayer with the Heterodox (Theological and Liturgical Consideration)
Fr. Paraskevas Agathonos D.D.

The Consequences of Orthodox Participation in the Ecumenical Movement on the Orthodox Witness to the Heterodox West
Fr. John Reeves

The Mystery of Baptism and the Unity of the Church
Fr. Peter A. Heers

Ecumenism and the New Age, Inter-religious Meetings and Dialogue
Monk Arsenios Vliangoftis D.D.

The Theological Identity of Protestantism
Demetrios Tselengidis, Professor, School of Theology, A.U.Th.

The Dialogue with the Anti-Chalcedonians: Problems and Achievements
Jean- Claude Larchet, Professor of Philosophy

Obstacles to Dialogue: the Ordination of Women, Marriages and Ordinations of Homosexuals
Christos Livanos, Chairman of the Orthodox Brotherhood of “Saint Athanasius”, Toronto, Canada

The Church of Poland vis-à-vis Ecumenism
Anthony Mironovitch, Professor, Department of Orthodox Theology, University of Bialistok

Ecumenism Distorts the Image of the God-man
Panagiotis Sotirchos, Author-Journalist

The Problem of Uniatism in Ukraine
Ivan Diatsekno, Professor, Ecclesiastical School “The Ladder”, Dviepropetrovsk

Excerpts from The Truth of our Faith

Table of Contents

The Prologue: The Life of Elder Cleopa of Romania (External copy)

Chapter 2: On Holy Scripture

Chapter 3: On Holy Tradition

Chapter 13: On the Presuppositions of our Personal Salvation

Chapter 15: On the Second Coming of Christ

Chapter 16: On the Thousand Year Reign (Chiliasm)

Chapter 18: On Glossologia (Speaking in Tongues)

Chapter 19: On Occultism and Magic

An Excerpt from Apostle to Zaire: The Life and Legacy of Blessed Father Cosmas of Grigoriou

Introduction

In every generation there are those few exceptional souls who rise out of the conventionality of social life to become pathfinders to the catholicity and otherworldliness of Christianity. Heroic and uncompromising, they imitate Abraham and become exiles and martyrs for Christ, following Him with loving exactness and mountain-moving faith. They “hate their life in this world” in order to keep it – and that of their neighbor’s – for eternity; and to successive generations they become models to imitate, witnessing, long after their departure, to the honour the Father bestows on those who serve Him.

Such a one was blessed Father Cosmas of Grigoriou, enlightener of Zaire.

A Model of Mission Work in this Age of Antichrist

From as early as eighteen years of age he received from God the call to work in His mission field. Possessed of a dynamic personality that “was inspired by a burning love for Christ, he did not want to live a conventional Christian life nor to be limited to some usual ecclesiastical career and service. He longed to offer himself entirely to God and his fellow man.” He sought not honors, for “his chief concern was with the salvation of men and the upbuilding of Orthodoxy in Zaire.” The beloved Cosmas was, in the words of the former Metropolitan Avgoustinos of Florina, “the trailblazer of a beautiful journey for our race.” He made Christ’s departing directive to “teach all nations” his point of departure from a life of compromise and port of entry for Orthodoxy in the sub-Saharan and the hearts of countless souls. Unlike the missionaries of heterodox confessions, he laid stress on both the first and second part of the Great Commission: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit; teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” His success, or rather faithfulness, in carrying out the first half of the Great Commission, was a direct result of his faithfulness and resolute determination to observe the second half, that is, to be exact in teaching them “to observe all things” that Christ has commanded us.

It could not be otherwise, for the African is neither as the contemporary European, worn out by centuries of dizzying ideologies and spent on a myriad of humanistic philosophies, nor as the typical American, quick to compromise and moderate things in order to achieve outward success. His noble, humble soul still inclines toward the other world and his simple, intuitive mind still has a healthy disposition for the noetic realm. A few months before his departure from this life, Father Cosmas visited the monastery of his repentance and spoke to the pilgrims there of this African nobility and their desire for authentic, ascetic Orthodoxy. Bishop Athanasios Yievtich, a close disciple of the great contemporary Church Father, Archimandrite Justin Popovich, was present and relates what Fr. Cosmas had to say:

“They are people with a sensitivity and awareness of the inner world. Europeans usually underestimate them, but they are very mistaken. The soul of the African inclines toward mysticism and for this reason Orthodoxy has something to say to them and something to offer, but only authentic Orthodoxy – monastic, hagiorite Orthodoxy. For among the brethren of Africa, witchcraft and magic holds great sway, a real demonocracy. In Africa, I saw how true the Gospel of Christ is! Everything that He said about the possession of men by the demons, I saw first hand. However, the Living and True God is more powerful than Satan and all his servants. Let it be understood, however, that true missionary-apostolic work cannot be carried out in Africa if one does not decide to leave his bones there.”

And so in teaching the native Africans the entire Gospel of Christ and revealing to them the undistorted Image of the God-man and His Church, it was only to be expected that his self-offering would likewise be complete and unqualified. In his “unique, genuine and very useful” study on mission work, entitled Thoughts about Missionary Work from Experience, he lays out the cornerstone principle for all who would follow his example:

“The missionary’s beginning is significant, however it is not the sum of the matter . . . The outset might be blessed or might become blessed at the end. What’s important is that the giving be true and total, without holding back, with a disposition to self-sacrifice and self-denial, and with the aim of leaving our bones among the natives . . .”

Long before one leaves his bones on the mission field, however, he must have discarded his pride and vainglory first, if he wants the final offering to be fruitful. Thus, for Fr. Cosmas the true missionary, in order to attain the blessed end, must leave no room for jealousy or vainglory, but rather must understand all to be shared: “common the struggle, common the pain, and common the glory of the Church.” He must “offer an open heart, love and communicate with others, concern himself with his own problems without adding more, being attentive to what others are doing, without turning to the devil and causing division.” And carrying out his duty in humility, “the true missionary does not seek recognition for his work, neither from the natives nor from those abroad, for the testimony of his sound conscience and the witness of his spiritual father and co-workers is sufficient for him.”

An Ascetic First

Father Cosmas left no room to doubt that he followed his principles, his words were based on experience and his beginning and end were blessed. And all of this is based on the fact that he “was first of all an ascetic and afterwards a missionary,” as Archimandrite Ioanikios has written elsewhere in this book. He knew from experience what asceticism, spiritual warfare, fasting, vigil and prayer mean for the Church. “We thank the Lord,” writes his Abbot George, “for, even if he was a man like us, he nevertheless disdained the earthly, the fleshly comforts, the human pleasures, all for the love of Christ, and chose a road that was harsh, combative, extremely tiring and humanly punishing. He did all of this for the love of God, his brothers and fellow men.”

Elder George further certifies all this with a story from Father Cosmas’ early days at the monastery: “I once passed by Fr. Cosmas’ little cell and saw his bed: wooden boards and on top of the boards, a little thin sheet. He didn’t even have a blanket. Having seen that, and other things, I thought that the brother had the grace of God and ought to become a monk.”

His asceticism, however, was not reserved to sleeping on wooden boards or even to fasting, vigil and prayer. Father Cosmas was above all unrelenting in his work of building up the Church in Zaire. Father Michael Christodoulidis of Cyprus writes of his visit to the Kolwezi mission and Father Cosmas’ asceticism in work:

“That which distinguished him most was his industry and diligence in work, his method and organization of labor, his intelligence, speed and facility in confronting difficulties, his ingenuity, and his unshakeable faith, spirit of love and sacrifice . . . Untiring in work, he would labor long hours in every kind of task. We didn’t know what midday was and what lunch means. The table of the Mission center is set from noon until late in the evening. Work ‘from the morning watch until night’ on roads that are non-existent, with vehicles and machines that were always breaking down, with bloody sacrifices, ‘in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, in wounds . . . in labors, in vigils’ (2 Cor. 6: 4-5).”

The above description not only finds repeated confirmation in a number of similar testimonies, but from the words of Father Cosmas himself, who at the same time points us to another aspect of his giving of priority to asceticism. He writes the following:

“It is well known that we all work here on a twenty four hour basis, under poor conditions, with the consequence being bodily strain and spiritual slackening. Consequently, toward the realization of spiritual and bodily replenishment, the existence of two monasteries, one men’s and one women’s, at some distance from the mission base, is deemed most appropriate . . . The monastery would work strictly as a monastery or, with the blessing of the local Metropolitan, as a metochian of Mount Athos, without any entangling with the mission.”

It was because Father Cosmas believed that a local Church could not stand without monasticism that he gave priority to the founding of a monastery and towards the end of his life he finally saw the realization of his plans with the establishment of the holy women’s Monastery of St. Nektarios.

Exactness in Orthodoxy

Shortly after Fr. Cosmas’ repose, upon seeing the spiritual labor he had accomplished, his successor Father Meletios said: “Father Cosmas’ work in Africa is quite extensive. I found the whole Athonite typikon in place in Zaire. The Christians with prayer ropes in their hands. In church they chant all together lead by the choir of boys. No one communes without first having confessed. They keep strictly the fasts of Wednesday and Friday. They celebrate daily the Divine Services of Matins, Vespers and Small Compline. And on Sundays the congregation exceeds four hundred.”

Many have commented: “How is it that the Africans, being only recently baptized, can maintain such an intensity and exactness in their Orthodoxy, while many of us in parishes in Greece, America and elsewhere are much more lax?” The answer, I believe, lies partly in that Father Cosmas, their father, guide, and example was himself strict and precise in his living and imparting of Orthodoxy. He was a monk in the long tradition of Athonite monasticism, and he hailed from the city of Ss. Cyril and Methodios, Thessaloniki, known for its rich ecclesiastical tradition. He kept with exactness, as well as discernment, the canons and standards of the Church, not out of some kind of reactionary conservatism or unfeeling zeal, but out of humility and because they provide what is best for man’s soul, derived as they are from the experience and wisdom of the Saints and Fathers of the Church.

One such issue in which he consciously chose the blessing of God’s Saints over the transient benefits of our ecumenical age was baptism. “When baptizing,” he says, “I implement the Athonite order of things. We’ve done 250 baptisms, and not only with idol worshippers, but also with Catholics who become Orthodox, we baptize them in deep rivers. My actions will have consequences when news reaches the Patriarchate of Alexandria, which holds that the Protestants are only in need of chrism. Until then, however, we will only do baptisms so as to have St. Nicodemos’ blessing.”

Father Cosmas, as is clear further down, was not one to fly in the face of ecclesiastical authority. His decision to baptize those coming from heterodox confessions was done purely out of love for their souls and their eternal salvation, as well as love for God and His Saints, not suffering his conscience to disobey their sacred teachings. He acted not only out of respect for the Saints of ages past, but out of obedience and humility before the wise counsels of living saints: “I remember the words of Father Paisios, who told me that most of the time the baptism that the heretics perform only passes over their skin.” Having this in mind, his love for the catechumens dictated that he provide them with the complete and saving initiation into the eternal life of the Church. This had consequences, of course, but not only for his relationship with the Patriarchate. Primarily it had consequences for the establishment of a spiritually healthy, powerful and faithful Orthodox Church, before which the Orthodox world now stands in admiration.

Similarly, Father Cosmas’ success in establishing a strong, stable and healthy Orthodox way of life among the natives is also due to his refusal to adopt non-Orthodox methods and style. Father Cosmas writes: “It is wrong to have recourse to the means and methods of the heterodox. Let us leave to Orthodoxy her own color, in faith, in teaching, and in her arts. Let it not fade in the mission field.” This should be applied not only to clear-cut mission fields, of course, but also to Orthodoxy in the Diaspora, as today many Orthodox often assimilate aspects of foreign cultures indiscriminately. For, if Father Cosmas’ words hold true, then we must not expect the kind of results we see in Kolwezi in our part of the world if we are busy appropriating “the means and methods” of the heterodox. One may have to work very hard to avoid this compromise, yet we have Father Cosmas and the Church in Zaire as testimony that the struggler will have his reward.

Father Cosmas did not stop at simply avoiding the influence of heterodox culture within Zaire. He extended this principle to protect those young souls he sent abroad to study and be formed in the Orthodox way. He writes: “It is almost assured that the young native is destroyed when sent to study in Europe, returning as a theologian only in terms of his diploma, not his heart . . . In Kolwezi, we send the pious young man to the monastery of our repentance . . . where he learns the Greek language, theological matters, dogmatics, ethics, worship, the typikon, iconography, and Byzantine music both in practice and theory. He studies Orthodoxy in the “university of the desert,” keeping company with sanctified elders and spiritually-gifted fathers and learning from them the ‘according to likeness.’ Purified and forming Christ within him, the young candidate becomes a good co-worker and our ideal successor.”

Father Cosmas’ care for the young native soul sent to study abroad arose out of his deep pastoral sensitivity and not out of any alleged ecclesiastical chauvinism. It was this sensitivity and a blessed single-mindedness and constant focus on bringing his disciples to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, and not any misguided idealism, that made it hard for him to countenance disregard of the canons. With respect to the canons governing ordination, this was particularly difficult because suitable candidates were few and the observance of the canons demanded much faith and patience. But, Father Cosmas, together with his Bishop, observed the canons, for they knew that there was a spiritual law at work and a punishment that the violators of the canons cannot escape. He writes: “The canons of the Church, of course, must be observed with respect to ordinations. Otherwise, the canons will avenge themselves and we will pay for our concessions (1 Tim. 3: 2-13).” And elsewhere he writes: “In areas where excessive tolerance is shown, the situation continually deteriorates and I am very concerned that at one point it will become incurable.”

Excerpt from the forthcoming book: The Truth of our Faith (Vol. II): On the Christian Mysteries

Chapter 2
On the Mystery of Baptism

Inquirer: In any case, not even Christ Himself received baptism as a child, but only when he had reached thirty years of age, since St. John the Baptist baptized none but adults. Shouldn’t we, then, accept baptism when we are of a mature age?

Elder Cleopa: The baptism with which Christ was baptized by John is not the same which we have received, since it did not have the same outcome. That baptism was only a baptism of water, and not a baptism “of water and the Spirit”, such as is the Christian baptism which was inaugurated by Christ. He was not baptized in order to be cleansed from sin, as is the case with our own baptism, since He was sinless and had no need to repent. The aim of that baptism was one thing, the aim of ours, another.
We know that the baptism “of water and the Spirit”, which came later, is undergone for the remission of sins. Jesus Christ, however, was not baptized with that baptism; to the contrary, Christ was sinless and had no need for such a baptism.

Inquirer: In this case, why, then, was Christ baptized with the baptism of John?

Elder Cleopa: St. John Chrysostom says the following: “When John the Baptist was baptizing, in the waters of the Jordan, he required repentance of all who approached. The very same baptism was called a baptism of repentance. In spite of this, John did not request Jesus to repent. On the contrary, standing before Him he felt humbled, saying that it was rather he himself who required baptism from Jesus, not the reverse (Mat. 3:14). Furthermore, he could not request repentance of Jesus, since Jesus had no sin, being “conceived of the Holy Ghost,” not of man, “not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man” (Mat. 1:20, Jn. 1:13, Lk. 1:34-35), and consequently, He was not an inheritor of the ancestral sin. Neither, however, did he have any personal sin (Jn. 8:16), since He had no need of a greater outpouring of the grace of the Holy Spirit upon Him, which, in any case, the baptism of John was not capable of offering. Why, then, was He baptized? Behold why: 

An Excerpt from The Truth of Our Faith by Elder Cleopa of Romania

The Prologue from The Truth of Our Faith

The Life of Elder Cleopa of Romania

The name and personality of Elder Cleopa Ilie of Romania is today known not only in his homeland but also throughout the world. Father Cleopa was born in 1912 in the town of Soulitsa and district of Botosani into a pious village family and named Constantine. His parents were called Alexander and Anna and he was the ninth of their ten children. The religious upbringing that he and all his siblings received from childhood as well as their great inclination toward the monastic life were so strong that five of the ten children, along with their mother in her later years, took up the monastic life and were clothed in the monastic Schema.

His spiritual formation was owed first of all to the Great-schema hieromonk Father Paisius Olarou of the Kozantsea-Bodosani skete who was for many years the Spiritual Father of his entire family. While spending his childhood years shepherding the familys sheep around the forests of Sihastria, the young Constantine, together with his two oldest brothers Basil and George, was being spiritually raised by their spiritual father hieromonk Paisius.

In the spring of 1929 the three brothers departed their fathers house and entered the struggle of the monastic life in the monastery of Sihastria which at that time was under the spiritual direction of Archimandrite Ioannicius Moroi, considered one of the greatest and holiest of spiritual fathers in Moldavia at the time. After seven years of trials the young novice Constantine Ilie was tonsured a monk in 1936 with the name Cleopa and continued for a number of years his beloved service of shepherding sheep as the student of a virtuous monk, Fr. Galaction.

The more than ten years of beloved service close to the sheep and in the midst of the natural beauty of the mountains and forests of Moldavia was for Father Cleopa a veritable school of spiritual formation and advancement in humility, stillness and prayer. Surrounded by the majestic Carpathian Mountains, the breeze of silence gently blew across the hillside above the fertile valley of Sihastria, whispering to the aspiring hearts of the young brothers Basil and Constantine a reminder of the presence of the Creator. Day flowed into day as time passed imperceptibly. The brothers rarely left the fold and did not even perform the customary cycle of services. Rather, they sought the altar of God within themselves, continually raising their minds eye to God through the sacred Prayer of the Heart.
It was here at the sheepfold that the soul of the future guide of the Romanian people would be formed. Elder Cleopa would later remember his nostalgic beginnings:

In the years that I was shepherd of the sketes sheep together with my brothers, I had great spiritual joy. The sheepfold, the sheep - I live in quiet and solitude on the mountain, in the midst of nature; it was my monastic and theological school.

It was then that I read Dogmatics by St. John Damascene and his Precise Exposition of the Orthodox Faith. How precious this time was to me! When the weather would warm up, we would put the yearling lambs and the rams in Cherry Meadow which was covered with green grass and surrounded by bushes. They would not stray from there. Stay put! Id say to them, and then I would read Dogmatics.

When I would read something about the Most Holy Trinity, the distinctions between angels, man and God, about the qualities of the Most Holy Trinity, or when I read about Paradise and hell - the dogmas about which St. John Damascene wrote - I would forget to eat that day.

There was an old hut in which Id take shelter, and there someone from the skete would bring me food. And when I would return to the hut in the evening, I would ask myself, Have I eaten anything today? All day long I was occupied with reading When I was with the sheep and cattle I read St. Macarius of Egypt, St. Macarius of Alexandria, and the Lives of the Saints in my knapsack when I first arrived at the monastery. I would read and the day would pass in what seemed like an hour

I would borrow these books from the libraries of Neamts and Secu Monasteries and carry them with me in my knapsack on the mountain. After I had finished my prayer rule, I would take out these books of the Holy Fathers and read them next to the sheep until evening. And it seemed as if I would see Saints Anthony, Macarius the Great, St. John Chrysostom and the others; how they would speak to me. I would see St. Anthony the Great with a big white beard and in luminous appearance he would speak to me so that all he would say to me would remain imprinted on my mind, like when one writes on wax with ones finger. Everything that read then I will never forget

In this university of obedience and silence, Father Cleopa read about one hundred theological and other works, starting with the theological, moral, liturgical, and hagiographic and ending with the patristic works of the great saints of our Church, not to mention, of course, the Horologion and Psalter. The most beloved book of all, however, was Holy Scripture. In addition to Scripture, Father Cleopa loved the lives of the Saints, the sayings of the desert fathers, The Ladder of Divine Ascent by Saint John Climacus, the ascetical works of Saints Isaac and Ephraim of Syria, as well as the writings of Saints Maximus the Confessor, Gregory Palamas, Symeon the New Theologian and others.

As he was endued with special reverence and much zeal for the divine, penetrating insight and comprehension of divine mysteries, and a powerful memory, in a short amount of time Father Cleopa was revealed as self-taught and unequalled among the monks of Romanian monasticism. In addition to these gifts of God, he was given the ability to teach and the strength of eloquence. In the beauty of the Moldavian ecclesiastical dialect, with the semi-archaic diction of an elder, and by means of preaching from Holy Scripture, selected patristic texts, and instructive ethical stories of all kinds, he presented the Truth to the people of God.

In 1942 Father Cleopa, although still a simple monk, temporarily assumed the governing of Sihastria in place of the ageing Abbot Ioannicius Moroi who was confined by sickness to his bed. In January of 1945 he was ordained deacon and priest and named abbot of Sihastria, serving in this capacity as the shepherd of souls for four years. In this short amount of time the Elder gathered around himself eighty monks and novices, built inside the walls of the monastery new housing for the monks, erected a winter chapel, restored the monastery to its original cenobitic status, organised it according to the traditional order of hesychastic monastic life, elevated important spiritual fathers and made many missionary journeys for the salvation of the faithful.

In 1947 the soviets occupied Romania, forcing King Michael to abdicate, and a communist dictatorship followed immediately. Monasteries were closed, coutless hierarchs, priests, monks, nuns and other faithful Orthodox were imprisoned, tortured, and murdered.

Thus far Sihastria had remained untouched in its remote location near the Carpathian Mountains. And although Abbot Cleopa was only thirty-six years old, he had already become a nationally known spiritual leader of the Christian faith. Now that he had been joined by his spiritual father from his youth, Elder Paisius Olaru, and had the support of Fr. Joel Gheorgiu, Sihastria was fast becoming the spiritual center of Orthodoxy for Romania and thus a threat to the communist government. By the grace which flowed from the eloquent mouth of Fr. Cleopa, a living faith was imparted to those who has ears to hear. The government now sought to dam the flow of faith by stopping Fr. Cleopa from speaking.